View Full Version : Aradorn
Aradorn
02-03-2005, 11:20 AM
i just felt the need to have my own thread with my name as the title...
you can go about yoru business now =)
Cinnabar
02-03-2005, 11:24 AM
I am not short on words, so please bear with the length of this letter. The rest of this letter is focused exclusively on Aradorn, not because I harbor any ill-will towards him, but because if he wanted to, he could limit the terms of debate by declaring certain subjects beyond discussion. He could elevate impetuous underachievers to the sublime. And he could force us to bow down low before saturnine vulgarians. We must not allow Aradorn to do any of these. There's something fishy about his paroxysms. I think he's up to something, something surly and perhaps even ill-bred. Couldn't you figure that out for yourself, Aradorn? What I wrote just a moment ago is not the paranoid rambling of an unimaginative, detestable wacko. It's a fact. He doesn't care about accountability in our public systems. I don't think anyone questions that. But did you know that he wins nincompoops over to his side using big words like "eulamellibranchiate"?
This raises another important point: There is an implicit assumption here that it's time for Aradorn to get back on the reality bus. To cap that off, hostility is a primary component of Aradorn's behavior. In view of that, it is not surprising that to get even the simplest message into the consciousness of the most complacent energumens you'll ever see, it has to be repeated at least 50 times. Now, I don't want to insult your intelligence by telling you the following 50 times, but Aradorn often starts with a preconceived story and then plugs in supposed "information" in order to create a somewhat believable tale. So what's the connection between that and Aradorn's canards? The connection is that if, five years ago, I had described a person like Aradorn to you and told you that in five years, he'd make us all miserable, you'd have thought me drossy. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how he might plague our minds before long. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome? If Aradorn bites me, I will honestly bite back. His concept of team play is sideline sulking. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that Aradorn's claim that the best way to serve one's country is to goad irresponsible beggars into hurling epithets at his enemies is not only an attack on the concept of objectivity, but an assault on the human mind. If I try really, really hard, I can almost see why Aradorn would want to befuddle the public and make sin seem like merely a sophisticated fashion.
He is differentiated from your average perfidious delinquents by virtue of the fact that he wants to create a world without history, without philosophy, without science, without reason -- a world without beauty of any kind, without art, without literature, without culture. The acid test for his "kinder, gentler" new apothegms should be, "Do they still send the wrong message to children?" If the answer is yes, then we can conclude that Aradorn's shell games are not witty satire, as he would have you believe. They're simply the obdurate ramblings of someone who has no idea or appreciation of what he's mocking. Education is already suffering as a result of Aradorn's diatribes. Surprisingly, the courts and our elected officials are way ahead of Aradorn in embracing this simple fact. I indisputably hope that his memoranda were intended as a joke, although they're not very funny if they were. Though I am not a proponent of conflict, perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of lackluster popinjays. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that Aradorn's claim that everything is happy and fine and good is factually unsupported and politically motivated. Speaking of what I call ophidian degenerates, Aradorn wants us to feel sorry for the politically incorrect libertines who make life less pleasant for us. I feel we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that Pecksniffian bribe-seekers who sell us fibs and fear, mixed with a generous dollop of parasitism will, hopefully, eventually be replaced by people who believe in freedom, justice, and the pursuit of personal growth. End of story. Actually, I should add that he should think about how his litanies lead the most damnable sensualists you'll ever see to put the foxes in charge of guarding the henhouse. If Aradorn doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet.
In this case, the obvious solution is also the correct one. This applies first and foremost to a group under whose noisome brand of antipluralism the whole of honest humanity is suffering: irascible doomsday prophets. Aradorn just keeps on saying, "I don't give a [expletive deleted] about you. I just want to seize control over where we eat, sleep, socialize, and associate with others."
I have a soft spot for the most uncivilized rabble-rousers you'll ever see: a bog not too far from here. If I want to wind up in a straitjacket and locked in a padded cell, that should be my prerogative. I unmistakably don't need him forcing me to. When surveyed, only two percent of Aradorn's satraps agreed with the statement, "Aradorn's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) are a threat to the freedoms enjoyed by all free citizens of the world." This is a frightening statistic to those who rely on, or simply support, social tolerance and open-mindedness. Finally, if this letter generates a response from someone of opposing viewpoints, I would hope that the author(s) concentrate on offering objections to my ideas while refraining from attacks on my person or my intelligence. I've gotten enough of that already from Aradorn.
Is there a sumary of what your saying, dont feel like wasting 5 minutes of my life on that.
Cinnabar
02-03-2005, 02:02 PM
I'm at work :(
Scintelle
02-03-2005, 02:08 PM
It's time to tell the truth about Jaus and Ven. Let's start with my claim that there is no doubt that Jaus and Ven will erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty before the year is over. Believe me, I would give everything I own to be wrong on that point, but the truth is that if you've read any of the politically incorrect slop that Jaus and Ven has concocted, you'll unequivocally recall Jaus and Ven's description of its plan to give voice, in a totally emotional and non-rational way, to its deep-rooted love of mandarinism. If you haven't read any of it, well, all you really need to know is that after hearing about Jaus and Ven's libidinous attempts to detach individuals from traditional sources of strength and identity -- family, class, private associations -- I was saddened. I was saddened that it has lowered itself to this level. Were he alive today, Hideki Tojo would be Jaus and Ven's most trustworthy ally. I can see Tojo joining forces with Jaus and Ven to help it force us to do things or take stands against our will. There are those who are informed and educated about the evils of despotism, and there are those who are not. Jaus and Ven is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that's why I assert that its subordinates mistakenly associate "lengthy" with "accurate" when it comes to its double standards. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that many people are convinced that it is an organization with more ambition than conviction. I can't comment on that, but I can say that on a television program last night, I heard one of this country's top scientists conclude that, "What was morally wrong five years ago is just as wrong today." That's exactly what I have so frequently argued, and I am pleased to have my view confirmed by so eminent an individual. Jaus and Ven makes it sound like it's some perfect angel of unstained ethical standards, and hence, by extension, Jaus and Ven's taradiddles always follow the same pattern. It puts the desired twist on the actual facts, ignores inconvenient facts, and invents as many new "facts" as necessary to convince us that the Eleventh Commandment is, "Thou shalt replicate the most meretricious structures of contemporary life". It would be nice to say that meddlesome paternalism doesn't exist anymore, but we all know that it does. Jaus and Ven is differentiated from your average wretched pseudo-intellectuals by virtue of the fact that it wants to get on my nerves.
I regret not writing this letter sooner. Yes, I could add that compared to these vainglorious reavers, every pimp is a man of honor, but I wanted to keep my message simple and direct. I didn't want to distract you from the main thrust of my message, which is that life isn't fair. We've all known this since the beginning of time, so why is Jaus and Ven so compelled to complain about situations over which it has no control? Well, I'm sure Jaus and Ven would rather accelerate the natural tendency of civilization to devolve from order to chaos, liberty to tyranny, and virtue to vice than answer that particular question. Make special note of that point, because Jaus and Ven's "I'm right and you're wrong" attitude is scabrous, because it leaves no room for compromise. Clueless social outcasts, more than any other segment of the population, like to defile the air and water in the name of profit. It's a pity. Jaus and Ven supports a wide variety of ramblings. Some are disruptive; others are insufferable. A few openly support isolationism.
It's Jaus and Ven's belief that my letters demonstrate a desire to resolve a moral failure with an immoral solution. I can't understand how anyone could go from anything I ever wrote to such a Pecksniffian idea. In fact, my letters generally make the diametrically opposite claim, that Jaus and Ven has stated that it has mystical powers of divination and prophecy. That's just pure collectivism. Well, in Jaus and Ven's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that there are few certainties in life. I have counted only three: death, taxes, and Jaus and Ven announcing some pathological thing every few weeks. While everybody believes in something, Jaus and Ven's simple faith in antagonism will have a serious destabilizing effect on our institutions. We must take the initiative to maximize our individual potential for effectiveness and success in combatting Jaus and Ven if we are ever to examine the social and cultural conditions that redefine unbridled self-indulgence as a virtue, as the ultimate test of personal freedom. Yes, this is a bold, audacious, even unprecedented undertaking. Yes, it lacks any realistic guarantee of success. However, it is an undertaking that we must sincerely pursue because the irony is that Jaus and Ven's most irritable inveracities are also its most indecent. As the French say, "Les extremes se touchent." If Jaus and Ven's pals had even an ounce of integrity, they would denounce those who claim that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to Jaus and Ven's eccentric prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers. This is not to say that Jaus and Ven wants to rid the world of "defective" people. It is merely to point out that if you read between the lines of Jaus and Ven's publications, you'll definitely find that Jaus and Ven is undoubtedly up to something. I don't know exactly what, but it claims that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication. Predictably, it cites no hard data for that claim. This is because no such data exist.
On the surface, it would seem merely that Jaus and Ven's sycophants merely present their allegations as though they were true, a technique known as a "conclusory" or "Kierkegaardian" leap. But the truth is that I am now in a position to define what I mean when I say that Jaus and Ven's hatchet men are stampeding happily and mindlessly toward the precipice of callow unilateralism. What I mean is that it is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand, while the other hand is busy trying to place stumbling blocks in front of those of us who seek value and fulfilment in our personal and professional lives. There is a vast empirical literature on this subject, and every intellectually honest person knows it. This raises the question: Will the world ever be free of disdainful creeps like Jaus and Ven? On the surface, it would seem to have something to do with the way that Jaus and Ven's beliefs (as I would certainly not call them logically reasoned arguments) are semi-intelligible in their impact, raving in their aspirations, ill-bred in their political deviousness, and resentful in their crapulous philosophies. But upon further investigation, one will find that it hates you -- yes, you, because you, like me, want to compile readers' remarks and suggestions and use them to carve solutions that are neither soporific nor testy. I undeniably hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before Jaus and Ven does any real damage. Or is it already too late? To answer that question, we need first to consider Jaus and Ven's thought process, which generally takes the following form: (1) The most morbid mountebanks you'll ever see have dramatically lower incidences of cancer, heart attacks, heart disease, and many other illnesses than the rest of us, so (2) we should all bear the brunt of its actions. Therefore, (3) every word that leaves its mouth is teeming with useful information and thus, (4) arriving at a true state of comprehension is too difficult and/or time-consuming. As you can see, Jaus and Ven's reasoning makes no sense, which leads me to believe that the reason it wants to prevent people from thinking and visualizing beyond an increasingly psychologically caged existence is that it's entirely brain-damaged. If you believe you have another explanation for its effete behavior, then please write and tell me about it.
Jaus and Ven's publicity stunts symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. Jaus and Ven doesn't have any principles, or if it does, it puts them aside whenever they're inconvenient. It is well known that we must stay the course and resist all temptations to promote racial superiority doctrines, ethnic persecution, imperialist expansion, and genocide. But I am intellectually honest enough to admit my own previous ignorance in that matter. I only wish that Jaus and Ven had the same intellectual honesty. Let me close by reminding you that the statements I made about Jaus and Ven in this letter are in earnest. I will not equivocate. I will not excuse. I will not retreat a single inch. And I will be heard.
Aradorn
02-03-2005, 04:56 PM
i should feel so priviledged =)
Lozzt One
02-03-2005, 05:38 PM
okies im gonna say my bit and then thats that
bashing ppls is ok but god there is no reason to write damn editorials about it god if you dont like them tell them and get over yourself
Gnioss
02-03-2005, 05:39 PM
lozzt you noobie lawl it's an automatic form generator.
Scintelle
02-03-2005, 05:50 PM
My goal for this letter is to protect little children from stinking airheads like Lozzt. I shall do this in the only honest way that I can, which is by simply setting forth those principles that I personally believe in and that I, for one, personally observe and honor. I realize that some of you may not know the particular background details of the events I'm referring to. I'm not going to go into those details here, but you can read up on them elsewhere. Our path is set. By this, I mean that in order to supply the missing ingredient that could stop the worldwide slide into heathenism, we must serve on the side of Truth. I myself consider that requirement a small price to pay because Lozzt has written volumes about how might makes right. Don't believe a word of it, though. The truth is that his perversions are a house of mirrors. How are we to find the opening that leads to freedom? If I'm not horribly mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that I should state this explicitly. Of course, this sounds simple, but in reality, the real issue is simple: The primary weapons of Lozzt's peremptory myrmidons are lies and deception. Finally, to those of you who are faithfully helping me comment on Lozzt's reports, let me extend, as always, my deepest gratitude and my most affectionate regards.
Cinnabar
02-03-2005, 08:45 PM
Unless you're a newly hatched pod person, you already know that Lozzt's true colors have finally come out. But let me add that Lozzt's serfs are easily manipulated. To begin at the beginning, ignorance is bliss. This may be why Lozzt's allies are generally all smiles. Were he alive today, Hideki Tojo would be his most trustworthy ally. I can see Tojo joining forces with Lozzt to help him mete out harsh and arbitrary punishment against his adversaries until they're intimidated into a benumbed, neutralized, impotent, and non-functioning mass.
He often starts with a preconceived story and then plugs in supposed "information" in order to create a somewhat believable tale. I state these facts only to give a bit of personal background as to why if anything, I've never bothered him. Yet he wants to erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty. Whatever happened to "live and let live"? One of Lozzt's favorite tricks is to create a problem and then to offer the solution. Naturally, it's always his solutions that grant him the freedom to perpetuate harmful stereotypes, never the original problem.
Lozzt recently stated that he is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. He said that with a straight face, without even cracking a smile or suppressing a giggle. He said it as if he meant it. That's scary, because if you've read this far, then you probably either agree with me or are on the way to agreeing with me. In essence, it would be charitable of me not to mention that his unedifying preoccupation with ageism will fill the air with recrimination and rancor by next weekend. Fortunately, I am not beset by a spirit of false charity, so I will instead maintain that it is easy to see faults in others. But it takes perseverance to keep the faith. Now that this letter has come to an end, let me remind you that it was intended to provide an accurate, even-handed, and balanced discussion of Lozzt and his philosophies. Please do not contact me with insults, death threats, or the like, because I will ignore them. If you disagree with my arguments or can provide further information about Lozzt, please contact me and I will endeavor to make any necessary corrections to this letter.
Aradorn
02-03-2005, 09:49 PM
so much hate...
more <3
Roxie
02-03-2005, 11:08 PM
ROFL HAHAHAHA
Scin just remember i know where you live now, and paybacks a bitch.
Scintelle
02-04-2005, 01:15 PM
Lol you're going to get me back for inserting your name into a complaint letter generator? BRING IT ON, BISH!
Cinnabar
02-04-2005, 05:18 PM
okies im gonna say my bit and then thats that
bashing ppls is ok but god there is no reason to write damn editorials about it god if you dont like them tell them and get over yourself
:smile_ok:
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.