BBC 2 v. CoD: MW2 - Page 2

GoodRevrnd · 03-10-2010, 05:36 AM

There's actually no accuracy difference between standing and crouch for anyone. iirc, all weapons have a (identical?) fixed number of seconds after last action before firing at max accuracy.

Those LMGs are OP though. They're all pretty good at spraying and praying at just about any range, which simply doesn't work with any other gun. I believe this is because all weapons have the same cone of maximum inaccuracy, and the substantially higher rate of fire of the LMGs simply yields a greater chance to land more shots on target within the same time frame.

A lot of the stats don't add up, either. The AN-94 seems to require far more shots on target to kill than it should and seems significantly more inaccurate than it should, especially for the 2nd round in the burst. There is of course the matter of faulty hit detection which complicates all my observations...

Cinnabar · 03-10-2010, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodRevrnd

A lot of the stats don't add up, either. The AN-94 seems to require far more shots on target to kill than it should and seems significantly more inaccurate than it should, especially for the 2nd round in the burst. There is of course the matter of faulty hit detection which complicates all my observations...

A lot of people on the boards are complaining that weapon damage needs to be upped. The solution for now is to play hardcore mode.

Nadric · 03-10-2010, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cinnabar

A lot of people on the boards are complaining that weapon damage needs to be upped. The solution for now is to play hardcore mode.

It's really apparent with some of the assault rifles. I think I was using the F2000 at the time, and emptied and entire clip into someone, hitting almost every single shot, and he didn't die.

What he did do however, was turn around and shoot me with his pistol, killing me.

I like BC2 a lot, but there are a ton of things in this game that just frustrate the shit out of me. Like being able to destroy objective points in rush matches with mortars.

Glaive · 03-10-2010, 11:38 AM

The problem with hardcore mode is that there are so many snipers

I still prefer it over normal mode, though. I always played MW on hardcore mode as well.

Cinnabar · 03-10-2010, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glaive

The problem with hardcore mode is that there are so many snipers

I still prefer it over normal mode, though. I always played MW on hardcore mode as well.

It's all those people that are too scrubby to account for bullet drop to get a head shot in normal mode.

Mourne · 03-10-2010, 03:32 PM

I don't like how you have to unlock and then "equip" extra damage mitigation (the armor thing) and weapon damage (the bullet velocity thing). Having to "equip" those at the expense of other sights and class boons is stupid imo. I've never liked games where you have to unlock things like that. Scopes, extra ammo, extra nades, class abilities, that's all good. But just increasing your guns damage to be able to kill someone more realistically? It's ridiculous.

GoodRevrnd · 03-10-2010, 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cinnabar

It's all those people that are too scrubby to account for bullet drop to get a head shot in normal mode.

Truth. Headshots are easy once you get the 12x scope.

Glaive · 03-10-2010, 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GoodRevrnd

Truth. Headshots are easy once you get the 12x scope.

easy on stationary targets

03-10-2010, 11:38 AM	#14
Glaive Pirate Companion Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Winland Posts: 379	The problem with hardcore mode is that there are so many snipers I still prefer it over normal mode, though. I always played MW on hardcore mode as well. __________________

03-10-2010, 03:32 PM	#16
Mourne Swabby Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: San Antonio Posts: 876	I don't like how you have to unlock and then "equip" extra damage mitigation (the armor thing) and weapon damage (the bullet velocity thing). Having to "equip" those at the expense of other sights and class boons is stupid imo. I've never liked games where you have to unlock things like that. Scopes, extra ammo, extra nades, class abilities, that's all good. But just increasing your guns damage to be able to kill someone more realistically? It's ridiculous. __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

03-10-2010, 05:36 AM	#11
GoodRevrnd Swabby Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 90	There's actually no accuracy difference between standing and crouch for anyone. iirc, all weapons have a (identical?) fixed number of seconds after last action before firing at max accuracy. Those LMGs are OP though. They're all pretty good at spraying and praying at just about any range, which simply doesn't work with any other gun. I believe this is because all weapons have the same cone of maximum inaccuracy, and the substantially higher rate of fire of the LMGs simply yields a greater chance to land more shots on target within the same time frame. A lot of the stats don't add up, either. The AN-94 seems to require far more shots on target to kill than it should and seems significantly more inaccurate than it should, especially for the 2nd round in the burst. There is of course the matter of faulty hit detection which complicates all my observations...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)